Windows and Linux

Similarities between (Girls and Windows) and (Boys and Linux)

Girls and Windows:

• Both have a great UI.
• Both consume large resources and do less work.
• Both crash unexpectedly.
• Both are not easily portable on different architectures (environment).
• Both can't work on low resource architectures (environment).
• Both are costly to maintain.
• Both give mostly unexpected outputs.
• Both's working often contradicts with their documentation.
• Both are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they (viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).
• In spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked.

Boys and Linux:

• Both have an average UI.
• Both are robust.
• Both are highly secure.
• Both can be easily modified to support new concepts/features.
• Both are highly efficient.
• Both are easily portable to any architecture (environment) no matter how low are resources.
• You can easily guess the output for your input (in Linux just open its code, for boys they are mostly transparent by nature).
• Both provide large support for development (work environment) .
• Both are poorly documented.